Independent technical review · Version-specific verification
AI can help anyone create software. Businesses still need confidence that the software has been professionally inspected. Assurance.Support reviews applications for security, reliability, maintainability, and production readiness.
Every application follows the same path
The trust gap
AI-assisted development has made software creation dramatically more accessible — and that is a good thing. But when a business decides to rely on an application, it still asks the same hard questions it always has.
Most builders cannot answer these questions with independent evidence. Assurance.Support exists to close that gap: experienced developers inspect the application, findings get fixed, and the result is a public, version-specific verification record.
What business buyers ask
The process
A structured five-step process from submission to a public verification record.
Tell us about your application, how it is built and deployed, and what you need assurance for. We confirm ownership and arrange secure, read-only access.
Together we document exactly what will be reviewed: the version, the deployment environment, the components in scope, and anything explicitly excluded.
Experienced developers combine automated scanning with manual code review, application testing, and architecture review, then classify every finding by severity.
You receive a prioritized remediation plan. Once fixes are in place, a reviewer independently retests the application to confirm each finding is resolved.
Applications that meet the standard receive a version-specific verification and a public record. Applications that do not pass receive a detailed remediation report — never a misleading badge.
Applications that do not pass receive a detailed remediation report rather than a misleading badge. Verification is only issued when the application meets the published standard.
Assurance levels
Choose the depth of review that matches how your application will be used.
For prototypes, internal tools, and smaller applications.
A structured baseline review that identifies the risks most likely to cause harm in early-stage and internal software.
For applications offered to business customers.
A full production-readiness assessment for software that businesses will rely on, with independent retesting after remediation.
Everything in Foundation Reviewed, plus:
For sensitive or business-critical applications.
The deepest level of review for applications that handle sensitive data or support critical business operations.
Everything in Business Ready, plus:
High Assurance is a rigorous independent technical review. It does not automatically constitute legal or regulatory certification.
What you receive
A plain-language summary for decision makers: what was reviewed, what was found, what was fixed, and the final verification outcome.
A technical, prioritized breakdown of every finding with severity ratings, affected components, and recommended fixes your team can act on.
A permanent public page showing the application, reviewed version, status, scope, conditions, and expiration — checkable by anyone.
A version-specific badge that links directly to your public verification record, giving prospective customers one-click proof of independent review.
Status system
Every public record carries a clear, current status. Businesses never have to guess whether a badge is still valid.
Met the standard within the documented scope.
Verified, with ongoing conditions attached.
Findings must be resolved before verification.
Temporarily on hold pending review.
Past its expiration date; recertification needed.
Withdrawn; the badge may no longer be displayed.
Assurance.Support separates remediation work from final verification. When fixes are performed by an associated remediation team, a different reviewer must conduct final retesting and make the verification decision. No one approves their own work.
Read our independence policy →You built something real. Verification gives you the independent evidence to sell it with confidence.
Before you rely on an application, check its independent verification record — not just the demo.
FAQ
No. Assurance.Support is an independent software-assurance organization. Verification reflects a technical review against our published methodology. It is not a government program, license, or legal certification of any kind.
No. No review process can guarantee that software is free from every defect or vulnerability. Verification means experienced developers inspected the application within a documented scope, confirmed that identified issues were remediated, and found it met the Assurance.Support standard at a specific version.
Yes. How the software was built does not disqualify it. We review the application as it exists: its security controls, reliability, maintainability, and operational readiness. Many well-built AI-assisted applications pass review; the process exists to prove it independently.
You receive a detailed remediation report that classifies each finding by severity and explains what needs to change. Nothing is published without your consent at this stage. Once you have remediated the findings, the application is independently retested. Applications that do not pass never receive a misleading badge.
Remediation is separate from verification. You can fix findings yourself, hire any developer you choose, or engage an associated remediation team. When an associated team performs fixes, a different reviewer must conduct the final retesting and make the verification decision.
Reviewers may not hold a financial interest in the applications they review, and remediation work is always separated from the final verification decision. Reviewers who participated in fixing an application are excluded from approving it. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed and result in reassignment.
A verification record carries an explicit issue date and expiration date — typically six months from issue. Businesses should always check that a record is active before relying on it. Recertification involves a streamlined re-review of the current version.
Material changes can invalidate a verification before its expiration date. These include changes to authentication or authorization, new data flows or integrations, significant architectural changes, and changes to the deployment environment. Routine dependency patches and small fixes generally do not, but each record documents its specific conditions.
Yes. Reviewers access code through time-limited, read-only credentials under a confidentiality agreement. Code is never shared outside the assigned review team, and access is revoked when the assessment concludes. The public verification record contains no source code — only the application identity, scope, status, and conditions.
Yes. Verification can be suspended or revoked if material undisclosed changes are discovered, if conditions attached to the record are not met, or if the badge is misrepresented. The public record always shows the current status, so a revoked verification cannot quietly continue to be displayed as valid.
No. Assurance.Support verification is an independent technical review, not a legal or regulatory certification. It does not establish compliance with HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO standards, or any law or regulation. Organizations with regulatory obligations should engage the appropriate auditors for those frameworks.
Yes. A business evaluating an application can request an assessment, provided the software owner authorizes access. This is a common path: the buyer gains independent evidence, and the builder gains a verification record they can present to future customers.
Start with a scope conversation. We will recommend the right assurance level for how your application will be used.